Publication Ethics


CTIAR operates the ethics of publication as one of its core values and as such, adheres strictly to internationally accepted writing standards. To ensure compliance, Canadian Tech-Institute For Academic Research employs the double-blinded peer-review process for all articles she reviews. The justification for the double-blinded peer-review process is to certify the reliability and novelty of the research work. This method also supports the authors to withdraw any errors or a gap in manuscript wrongly ignored and assists in making the research more applicable in real-time.



Canadian Tech-Institute For Academic Research Journals adopts the COPE guidelines on publication ethics:


Authors must confirm the following; that Submitted manuscripts must be the original work of the author(s); Only unpublished manuscripts should be presented; It is dishonest to submit a manuscript to more than one journal concurrently; Any dispute of interest must be explicitly stated; The roots of data used in the development of the manuscript is acknowledged; All flaws identified in the manuscript after submission must be swiftly communicated to the Editor.


Reviewers are scheduled to evaluate a manuscript for final analysis, comparative analysis and substantial integrity and originality of the research work. Consequently, reviewers must approve the following; that:
All papers are reviewed in consideration based on the intellectual content of the article notwithstanding of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor partisan values of author(s); Any perceived conflict of interest during the review process must be reported to the Editor; All information about the manuscript is kept confidential; Any information that may be the reason for the rejection of publication of a manuscript must be reported to the Editor.


Editors must reinforce the following; that: All manuscripts are evaluated in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political advantages of authors; Information concerning to manuscripts are kept confidential; Any observed conflict of interest pertaining to papers must be confessed; Editorial Board takes responsibility for making publication decisions for submitted papers based on the reviewer’s evaluation of the journal, policies of the journal editorial board and legal restrain performing against plagiarism, libel, and copyright infringement.